Kumar Hanumant Pujari v. The State Of Maharashtra

Mhi 1 BA-912-16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 912 OF 2016 Kumar Hanmant Pujari ...

Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent Ms. Neesha Mailgir,Advocate for the applicant. Mr.Arfan Sait,APP, for the State.

Mr. S.C.Bhalerao, PI, Manpada Police Station, present.

CORAM:

SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.

DATE : 14th February, 2017.

P.C.

The learned APP submits that in the present case, the applicant has been acquitted by the Sessions Court vide judgment and order dated 3.2.2017. Hence, the prayer in the application has become infructuous. 2.

The learned counsel for the applicant has put in her best efforts to espouse the cause of the applicant. Her professional fees are quantified at Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one thousand only) to be paid to the learned counsel within three months from today.

(SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)