Anamika Kripashankar Tiwari v. The State Of Maharashtra

by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date:

2023.02.01 12:00:43 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Chitra Sonawane. 1 8-WP-1939-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR.WRIT PETITION NO.1939 OF 2021 Anamika Kripashankar Tiwari ...

Petitioner Age 30 years, Occ:Advocate R/a Bldg. No.15, Runghtha House, Room No.29, 5th Floor, 2nd Fofalwadi, Kalbadevi road, Bhuleshwar road, Mumbai-400 002.

Versus

1.The State of Maharashtra

2. The Sr.Inspector of Police.

3. B. S. Pawar

4. Mrs. Poojoa Ashutosh Mishra ...

Respondents.

----- Mr Babu Singh, Advocate i/b Jigar Agarwal for the Petitioner. Mr V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr S. H. Singh i/b Satyam R. Dubey for Respondent No.4. ----- CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 31 JANUARY 2023.

P.C. :- .

The Investigating Officer, Mr.B.K.Kamble, PSI, through learned APP Mr.Konde-Deshmukh, has placed on record, a

Chitra Sonawane. 2 8-WP-1939-2021.doc communication dated 31st January, 2023, thereby informing that during investigation, no adverse evidence could be noticed about involvement of the Petitioner in commission of the offence and as such, it was decided not to charge-sheet the Petitioner. 2.

Since the statement is made on instructions, by the learned APP, same is accepted.

3.

In the aforesaid background, we do not see any reason to keep the petition pending. The Petition is, accordingly, stands disposed of.

[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]