Mangala Ramchandra Sutar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

Yadav VG. 1 13.wp.5803.15.odt.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5803 OF 2015 Mangala Ramchandra Sutar .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Mr. Vijay Suhas Gharat for Petitioner.

Mr. Shriniwas S. Patwardhan for Respondent No.5. Ms. Aparna Vahatkar, AGP for Respondents/State.

CORAM

:

R. M. BORDE AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 28, 2017.

P.C.

.

We do not find any reason to cause interference in exercise of the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2.

It would however be open for Petitioner to tender representation setting forth his grievance to the District Collector and the Collector may, if deemed necessary, direct to conduct investigation and take appropriate measures on consideration of said representation.

3.

With liberty as aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of.

[A. S. GADKARI, J.] [R. M. BORDE, J.]