Ravindra Janak Gundolkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

sr.31.appa.668.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.668 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.380 OF 2017 Ravindra Janak Gundolkar ...

Applicants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

...

Respondents Mr.Abhishek Yende for the applicant.

Mr. P.H. Gaikwad-Patil for the respondent/State. Mr.S.V.Marwadi for Torrent Power Ltd.

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

DATED : 26th SEPTEMBER 2018.

P.C. :

1.

Mr.Marwadi, the learned Counsel appearing for M/s.Torrent Power Ltd. submits that the affected party is Torrent Power Ltd who had filed subject FIR with the MSEDCL Kalyan Police Station. Neither the affected party i.e. M/s. Torrent Power Ltd is joined as party to the instant application nor it appears that the said affected party had consented for compounding of the offence.

Vina k 1/2

sr.31.appa.668.2017 2.

Compounding of offence cannot be done unilaterally. In this view of the matter, the application is therefore rejected. Digitally signed by Vina Arvind Khadpe Date:

2018.09.26 11:00:48 +0530 Vina Arvind Khadpe (A.M.BADAR J.) Vina k 2/2