Mr. Jagdish Trikamji Gajjar v. Mr. Maheshchandra Trikamji Gajjar And ORS.

Shubhada S Kadam 17 IA 18982.2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 18982 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 249 OF 2019 Jagdish Trikamji Gajjar ....Applicant/ Appellant

Versus

Maheshchandra Trikamji Gajjar and ors.

....Respondents Mr. Sanjay T. Manek, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Ms. Ujjwala Deshmukh i/b. Pradhan and Rao, Advocates for the Respondent No.1 and Proposed Respondent Nos.1A to 1C. CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.

DATE : 19th DECEMBER, 2022.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that respondent No.1 died during the pendency of the appeal, hence, it is necessary to bring the legal heirs of the deceased on record. 1/2 by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2022.12.20 10:42:18 +0530 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM

Shubhada S Kadam 17 IA 18982.2022.doc 3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) and is disposed of.

4.

The applicant to take steps within two weeks from today. (S. G. DIGE, J.) 2/2