Ajay Chandrakumar Doshi And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Thru Gp And ORS

901-wp-8952-2019.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8952 OF 2019 Ajay Chandrakumar Doshi and Anr.

...Petitioners

vs.

The State of Maharashatra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Kunal Katariya i/b. F.K. Khan, for the Petitioners Mr. Prayag Joshi i/b. Mr. Bipin Joshi, for Respondent No. 4. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : N.B. SURYAWANSHI, J.

DATE :

OCTOBER 25, 2019 (VACATION COURT) P.C.:

.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the contesting Respondent.

2.

The Petitioner No. 1 as well as Respondent No. 4 are personally present in the Court, they are identified by their respective counsels. The learned counsel for Respondent No. 4 files vakalatnama and confirms that the parties have settled the dispute and have filed consent terms. The affidavit (page 86 of the paper book) is filed by the Petitioners along with the consent terms (Exhibit A) at page 88 and the affidavit (Exhibit B) of the contesting Respondent No. 4 is at page 113. Vishal Parekar 1/2

901-wp-8952-2019.doc 3.

The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise/consent terms (Exhibit A) and the affidavits filed by the Petitioners and Respondent.

4.

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (N.B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2