Joseph Ppubal Rayen v. Vasantha Pubal Rayen And ANR

916_1884_15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1884 OF 2015 Joseph Pubal Rayen

...Petitioner

Versus

Mrs. Vasantha Pubal Rayen & Anr.

...Respondents

------ Mr. R.M. Kanojiya for the Petitioner.

Mr. V.B.K. Deshmukh, APP for Respondent No.2-State. CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.

DATED :8th JULY, 2015.

P.C.

Admit. Heard finally.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned APP for Respondent No.2-State.

3.

The Petitioner challenges the order passed by learned Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.401 of 2014 directing the Petitioner to pay interim maintenance of Rs.1,000/-p.m. to Respondent No.1 i.e. his wife. The Petitioner was earlier directed to pay Rs.2,000/- p.m. to Respondent No.1 by the order of the Magistrate. Order of the Magistrate has been modified by the learned megha Page No.1 of 2

916_1884_15.doc Sessions Judge and in my opinion there is no scope for interference in the said order as it is an interim order and moreover amount of Rs.1,000/- is not a huge amount, which could be reconsidered again. 4.

The criminal writ petition stands dismissed summarily. (JUDGE) megha Page No.2 of 2