← Library
Bombay High CourtCAC/241/2017

Swamirao Krishnatrao More v. The Executive Engineer, Ujani Cannal Division No.8 And ORS

2019-01-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated2 pages

(19)-cac-241-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.241OF 2017 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.12356 OF 2017 Swamirao Krishnatrao More .. Applicant

Versus

The Executive Engineer and Ors.

.. Respondents Mr.Prasad P. Kulkarni i/b Kalpesh U. Patil for the Applicant. Mrs.Tanya Goswami, AGP for State.

CORAM : K.K. TATED, J.

DATE : 10 JANUARY 2019.

P.C:- .

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

By this Civil Application, applicant is seeking condonation of 30 days delay in filing Civil Revision Application. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently it remain on their part to file Civil Revision Application within time. He submits that they have good chance of success in the present matter. If the delay is not condoned, irreparable loss will cause to them. He submits that this Court be pleased to condone the delay and matter may be heard on its own merits.

S.C.Magar

(19)-cac-241-2017.doc 3.

Learned AGP appearing on behalf of State vehemently opposed the present Civil Application. She submits that applicant has not shown sufficient cause for condonation of inordinate delay of 30 days. Hence, there is no substance in the present Civil Application and same is required to be dismissed with cost. 4.

Considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the applicant and reasons disclosing in paragraph 3 of Civil Application, I am satisfied that applicant has made out case for allowing this Civil Application. Hence, following order : a) Delay in filing Civil Revision Application is condoned.

b) No order as to costs.

(K.K.TATED, J.) S.C.Magar