Mumtaz Salim Sayed And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

by IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date:

2021.08.02 15:04:12 +0530 IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 914 OF 2019 MUMTAZ SALIM SAYED AND ANR ....APPLICANTS V/s.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .....RESPONDENT WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2019 KHURSHID BANO SADAKAT SHEKH ....APPLICANT

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

MUMTAZ SALIM SAYED AND ANR ....APPLICANTS V/s.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .....RESPONDENT Mr. Mahindra B. Deshmukh for the applicant Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushik APP for the State Mr. Dayaram B. Kadu, P.S.I. Shivaji Nagar Police Station CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE:

AUGUST 2, 2021.

P.C.:

1] Learned counsel for the applicant informs that amount of Rs. 1/3

1,00,000/- each as was assured is already deposited by the applicants.

2] Applicants are seeking pre-arrest bail in C.R. No. 356/2018 registered with Shivaji Nagar Police Station for offence punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Applicants were gratned Ad-interim protection on 16/04/2019. 3] The allegations in the F.I.R. are, applicants under the false promise accepted amount illegally from the complainant. 4] The fact remains that since last more than two years, applicants are on Ad-interim protection and to show their bonafdes, they have deposited Rs. 1,00,000/- each in this Court as is informed by the learned counsel for the applicants.

5] In the aforesaid background, learned APP informs that custody of the applicants is not required.

2/3

6] In view of above, let the amount be transmitted to the Investigating Offcer in the said crime.

7] In view of statement made by learned APP on instructions that the custody of the applicants is not required, application stands disposed of as infructuous.

8] In view of disposal of anticipatory bail application, intervention application also stands disposed of.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] 3/3