Rahul Surendra Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra

spb/ 14apl456-15.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 456 OF 2015 Rahul Surendra Shinde ... Applicant.

V/s.

State of Maharashtra ... Respondent.

--- Mr. S. C. Halli i/by Subhash Hulyalkar, Advocate for the Applicant.

Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar, APP for the State.

--- CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI,J.

DATE : 05th MAY, 2015 P.C. :

Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on production board.

Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant and the learned additional public prosecutor for the State.

Keeping in view the statutory provisions of section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, it was necessary for the learned Sessions Judge to decide the anticipatory bail application or to grant interim order. He has neither decided Borey 1/2

spb/ 14apl456-15.sxw the anticipatory bail application nor has he granted interim order.

It is, therefore, directed that the anticipatory bail application of the applicant shall be decided on 6th May, 2015. If the learned Judge is not able to decide the main application, he shall grant interim relief to his satisfaction. Order accordingly. The application stands disposed of.

(JUDGE) .....

Borey 2/2