M/S B.G.Shirke Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd. v. Kusum Agrotech Propritor And An
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
44.CAF(ST)No.136932013(FANo.3922001)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 392 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLIATION (ST) NO.13693 OF 2013 AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 392 OF 2001 M/s.B.G.Shirke Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd. ...
Applicant.
In the matter of :
Kusum Agrotech Proprietor ...
Appellant.
Kusum Products Ltd.
Versus.
M/s.B.G.Shirke Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd. ...
Respondent.
.....
Mr.Sukand R.Kulkarni, Advocate for Applicant. Adv.Nilesh Ukey a/w.Gajanan Shinde i/b.Thakore Jariwal & Associates, Advocate for Respondent/Original Appellant.
.....
CORAM :MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE:24th DECEMBER 2013 P.C. :
Registry to register the application as the objection is removed. Learned counsel submits that this application is moved by the respondent/applicant seeking permission to withdraw the bank guarantee No.BOM 0003/BG No.255/09. Learned counsel submits that as three years are expired, the previous bank guarantee is over. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the application, application is Gaikwad RD 1/2
44.CAF(ST)No.136932013(FANo.3922001) allowed in terms of prayer clause (c). It is also specifically mentioned that sufficient bank guarantee be produced within four weeks from today. ( MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. ) Gaikwad RD 2/2