Ranga Gopalrao Kulkarni v. Keshav Dattatraya Patankar And ORS.

P.H. Jayani 03 CAW1471.17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5337 OF 2003 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1471 OF 2017 Ranga Gopalrao Kulkarni ....Petitioner V/s.

Keshav Dattatraya Patankar & Ors.

....Respondents Mr. L.H. Patil for the petitioner.

Mr. Kshitish Shukla for respondent nos.7 to 10, 12 and 13. CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2018.

P.C.:

.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing any claim against respondent nos.1 to 6 and therefore, the Consent Terms between the petitioner and respondent nos.7 to 13 is not binding on respondent nos.1 to 6.

2.

The petitioner and power of attorney holder of respondent nos.7 to 13 is present. Respondent No.10 is present himself and he holds the power of attorney for respondent nos.7, 8, 9, 12 and 13. The identity of the petitioner and power of attorney holder of respondent no.10 is

P.H. Jayani 03 CAW1471.17.doc verified by Court Sheristedar. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as 'Exhibit­A' for identification. The petitioner has filed the application for withdrawal of this petition which is marked as 'Exhibit­ B' to the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays that in view of those Consent Terms, the petitioner wants to withdraw the Writ Petition.

3.

Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Civil Application No. 1471 of 2017 does not survive and the same is also disposed of. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)