Satish Kantilal Kayasth And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra
BDP-SPS-tac
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.919 OF 2019 Subhash Namdeorao Karad & Anr.
] ... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 871 OF 2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.919 OF 2019 Gopal Kantilal Kayastha ] ... Intervener
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Subhash Namdeorao Karad & Anr.
] ... Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.922 OF 2019 Dinesh Jayantial Bhatevara ] ... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent 1/3
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 869 OF 2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.922 OF 2019 Gopal Kantilal Kayastha ] ... Intervener
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Dinesh Jayantial Bhatevara ] ... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.923 OF 2019 Satish Kantilal Kayasth & Anr.
] ... Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 870 OF 2019 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.923 OF 2019 Gopal Kantilal Kayastha ] ... Intervener
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Satish Kantilal Kayasth & Anr.
] ... Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent 2/3
----- Mr. Vivek Arote a/w Mr. Piyush Toshinval a/w Aashish Satpute for the Applicant in All the ABAs.
Mr. Pratik K. Kalantri, Intervener in APPPs.
Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushik, APP for the State.
----- CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: JULY 17, 2021 P.C.:- 1] It is informed that parties have amicably settled the matter and will be moving for quashing by consent before Division Bench. 2] In the aforesaid backdrop, ad-interim protection in all these Applications is continued for a period of six weeks from today, so as to facilitate the complainant and applicants to move for quashing by consent.
3] In view of above, Application stands disposed of. ( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 3/3