Ramraj Shivanand Shetti v. Seema Ramraj Shetti

2-cam-135-2012.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.135 OF 2012 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.60 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.105 OF 2014 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.53 OF 2012 Ramraj Shivanand Shetti ...Appellant vs.

Seema Ramraj Shetti

...Respondent

Ms. Sushma Singh, for the Appellant.

Mr. S.B. Shetye a/w. Ms. Shreya Jadhav, for the Respondent. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M. S. SONAK, JJ.

DATE :

JULY 20, 2017 P.C.:

.

Parties through their counsel.

2.

The parties have filed the consent terms and prayed for passing of the decree in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms have been attested by the Appellant-husband in front of the notary at London. The Respondent-wife and the power of attorney holder of the Appellant-husband i.e. the father of the Appellant are present in person.

Vishal Parekar 1/2

2-cam-135-2012.doc 3.

The consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.

4.

As per the consent terms, the impugned judgment/decree passed on 27th February, 2012 by the trial Court is set aside.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, Appeals are disposed of as per the consent terms.

6.

As a result, the Civil Applications also stand disposed of.

(M. S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2