← Library
Bombay High CourtAO/705/2018

Dindoshi Vrindavan Co-Operative Housing Society Liited Thr.Its Chairman And Secretary And ANR v. M/S. Karan Group Builders And Developers Thr. Its Partner Mr. Mahesh B.Oza

2018-10-08Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi2 pages

3 AOST 12756 OF 2018.odt vks

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.12756 OF 2018 Dindoshi Vrindavan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.

...

Appellant.

V/s.

M/s Karan Gropup Builders and Developers ...

Respondents Mr. Atul Damale, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Satyjajeet Shirke and Mr. Omkar Mane, i/by Uday P. Warunjikar for the appellant.

Mr. Rakwesh D. Kumar a/w Mr.Manoj S. Singh i/by MKS Legal Assocates, for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM : DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.

DATE : 8st OCTOBER, 2018.

P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the appellant and respondents. 2] This appeal is preferred challenging the order dated 27th October, 2017, passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, thereby granting the order of ad-interim relief, restraining respondent No.2, that is preset appellant, from carrying out any construction at the suit site till next date.

3] While passing the said order, the trial Court has has kept all the points open about the preliminary objection. Therefore, the Notice of Motion is yet pending and the trial Court has kept all the 1/2

3 AOST 12756 OF 2018.odt issues open to be decided.

4] By way of additional affidavit filed in this Court, learned counsel for appellant has brought on record the subsequent developments including the ad-interim order of interim injunction dated 15th September, 2018, passed by the trial Court in the Draft Notice of Motion in L.C.Suit No.2475 of 2018. 5] In my considered opinion, in view of this subsequent development and considering that the order impugned in this appeal is only of ad-interim nature, it would be appropriate if the trial Court is directed to decide the Notice of Motion itself, instead of this Court entering into the merits of the matter.

6] Hence the appeal stands dismissed with request to the trial Court to decide the Notice of Motion as expeditiously as possible. [DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] 2/2