← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2155/2019disposed off

Mahadev Namdev Alias Zanzu Patil And ORS. v. The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) Metro Centre No. 3 Panvel And ORS.

2019-03-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.M. Borde3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2155 OF 2019 Mahadev Namdev alias Zanzu Patil and others.

... Petitioners.

V/s.

The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) Metro Centre No.3, Panvel & Others ... Respondents.

--- Ms. Deepa Punde, Advocate I/by Mr. Sachin S. Punde for the Petitioners.

Mr. P. P.More, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 5 (State). Mr. A. M. Kulkarni, a/with Mr. S.S. Diwan for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

--- CORAM :

R. M. BORDE AND N. J. JAMADAR,JJ.

DATE :

19th MARCH, 2019.

P.C.:

1] The petitioners are agriculturists, whose landed property has been acquired for the public purpose. It transpires that the awards determining the amount of compensation in respect of the acquired property have been declared by the Land Acquisition Officer on 11.11.1985 and 07.03.1986. The petitioner did not raise a challenge to the awards, however, tendered two applications on 31.07.2003 under section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred as the "Act") for re-determination of the amount of compensation on the basis of the judgment and award in a Land Acquisition Reference presented by the 1/3

claimant covered by the same section 4 notification. The amount of compensation is stated to have been redetermined and the award under Section 28-A(2) of the Act has been declared directing enhancement in the amount of compensation on 07.07.2016 and 08.07.2016. The petitioner is in receipt of a notice issued by the Land Acquisition Officer under section 12(2) of the Act. It is the contention of the petitioner that though notice has been received by him calling upon him to collect the amount of compensation in the year 2016, the amount has not yet been disbursed. 2] We have heard respective counsel for the parties.

3] Learned counsel appearing for the CIDCO states that the amount of compensation recorded in the notice issued under section 12(2) of the Act would be deposited, if the same has not been deposited, with the Land Acquisition Officer and the said amount would be disbursed to the petitioner through the Land Acquisition Officer. The statement made is accepted. The CIDCO shall deposit the amount recorded in the notice under section 12(2) of the Act with the Land Acquisition Officer, who shall disburse the said amount to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today. The Land Acquisition Officer shall, on deposit of amount by CIDCO shall disburse the same to claimant, forthwith. In case amount of compensation is already deposited by CIDCO, with the Land Acquisition Officer, same shall be disbursed forthwith.

2/3

4] It is pointed out by counsel appearing for the petitioners that the amount of interest has been determined till the date of issuance of notice under section 12(2) of the Act i.e. upto 08.07.2016 and 21.07.2016 respectively. The petitioner is entitled to claim interest on the amount of compensation in accordance with section 28 of the Act till the date of payment. The entitlement of the claimant to receive the amount of interest statutorily required to be paid cannot be denied and the respondent - Land Acquisition Officer need to be directed to compute the amount payable to the petitioner towards the interest from 01st July, 2016 till the date of payment. The computation shall be made by the Land Acquisition Officer within a period of two weeks from today.

The CIDCO shall deposit the amount payable towards the interest as recorded above with the Land Acquisition Officer within a period of one month from the date of computation of the amount by the Land Acquisition Officer. The amount of interest computed by the Land Acquisition Officer, as above, shall be deposited by the CIDCO with the Land Acquisition Officer and the same shall be disbursed to the petitioner - original claimant within a period of five months from today.

5] In view of the above directions, Writ Petition is disposed of.

(N.J. JAMADAR, J.) (R.M. BORDE,J.) .....

3/3