Jyoti Nanjunde Gowda v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

25 wp 1888.17.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1888 OF 2017 Jyoti Nanjunde Gowda ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

..Respondents Ms. Ruby Shaikh i/b. Shaikh Mohd. Imran, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Pednekar, APP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & PRAKASH D. NAIK, J J.

DATE : 5th OCTOBER, 2017.

P. C. :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petition is filed for transfer of investigation into FIR bearing CR No.92 of 2017 registered with Santacruz Police Station, Mumbai.

3.

Mr. Pednekar, learned APP, on instructions of the officer concerned, makes a statement that the investigation into the subject FIR is almost complete and the investigating officer has arrested two accused and charge-sheet would be filed within a period of two weeks from today. The statement is accepted.

Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

25 wp 1888.17.doc 4.

In the light of the above statement, the learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly concedes that the petitioner's grievance no more survives. The writ petition, accordingly, stands dismissed. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2