Santosh Anand Dhumal v. The State Of Maharashtra

14.ba963.16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 963 OF 2016 Santosh Anand Dhumal.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Shriram S. Chaudhari, advocate for Applicant. Mr. S.K. Shinde, a/w. Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for State. --- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 P.C.:

Learned APP submits that in the present case, substantive evidence of 6 witnesses has been recorded. Hence, it would not appropriate for this Court to consider the prayer for enlargement on bail in the midst of trial. On this ground, the application stands rejected and disposed of accordingly.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) Talwalkar 1/1