Vikrant Vinod Chavan v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/1 27-wp-1896-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1896 OF 2017 Vikrant Vinod Chavan

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

...

Through Jail-None for the petitioner.

Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for Respond/State.

...

by DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE Date:

2022.06.15 17:34:41 +0530 DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 15th JUNE, 2022 P.C.:

1.

The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the respondent/authority to produce with escort before the trial Court on the dates fixed by the trial Court in his pending case. 2.

Learned APP, on instructions, submits that the trial is not yet concluded. Hence, we direct the concerned Authority to produce the petitioner on the due dates of effective hearing before the trial Court. 3.

With the above observation, Writ Petition stands disposed of. (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.) Dnyaneshwar Ethape, PA