High Court On Its Own Motion v. Mr. Himanshu Verma, Chairman And Managing Director Of M/S. Navrattan Blue Crette Industries Pvt.Ltd

ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3583 OF 2021 IN (SUO MOTO) CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 193 OF 2020 BILKIS ABDULLAH KAZI ....APPLICANT V/s.

HIGH COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION .....RESPONDENT WITH (SUO MOTO) CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 193 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 93014 OF 2020 HIGH COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION .....PETITIONER V/S.

MR. HIMANSHU VERMA, CHAIRMAN .....RESPONDENT MANAGING DIRECTOR OF M/S.

NAVRATTAN BLUE CRETE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.

Mr. Vishal Kanade a/w Ms. Manisha Virkhare, Mr. Sachin Mahagavkar, Ms. Shraddha and Ms. Ankita Ved i/b Divya Shah Associates for the Applicant in IA and for Respondent in Contempt petition Mr. S. D. Rayrikar AGP for Respondent in IA None for Petitioner in Contempt Petition CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE:

JUNE 20, 2022.

1/3

P.C.:

1) In view of the order dated 08/04/2022, attempts were made to serve the contemnor. Fact remains that contemnor represented before this Court through a lawyer and since said lawyer stopped appearing, this Court was prompted to pass the order dated 08/04/2022 directing fresh notice.

2) Attempts to serve notice to contemnor remained futile as address on which notice was sought to be served was informed to be changed without any intimation.

3) As such, it appears that contemnor on his own abandoned his claim in the present matter.

4) In this background, having regard to the fact that amount of Rs. 17,85,000/- with accrued interest is due and receivable by the Applicant towards accommodation charges, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 15(a) which reads thus: "a.

that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass an Order allowing the Applicant to withdraw a sum of Rs. 17,85,000/- (Rupees Seventeen Lakh Eighty Five Thousand Only) being deposited by the Petitioner in the present Petition.

2/3

5) As Mr. Kanade, counsel appearing for the Decree Holder submits that if order of eviction and payment of accommodation is complied with, he has no objection in finally disposing of the contempt proceedings.

6) In the aforesaid background, contempt proceedings stands disposed of.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date: 2022.07.22 12:46:04 +0530 3/3