Rohini Raju Khamkar v. Raju Ranba Khamkar

1.cp.276.2013.doc dik

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 276 OF 2013 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 290 OF 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 69 OF 2009 Rohini Raju Khamkar

...Petitioner.

vs Raju Ranba Khamkar

...Respondent.

.....

Mr Krupanshu Nandu I/b Tajesh Dande for the Petitioner. Mr Raju Ranba Khamkar, the Respondent, party in person present.

.....

CORAM : K.K.TATED, & B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ.

AUGUST 03, 2018.

P.C. :

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. The Respondent Raju Khamkar, the party in person, present in the Court.

The Respondent, party in person, submits that he has cleared all arrears of maintenance to be given to the Petitioner. Learned advocate for the Petitioner accepts this fact. Not only this, he has given in writing to that effect. The same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The same is accepted.

In view of subsequent developments, we do not find Pg 1 of 2

1.cp.276.2013.doc any reason to take any action against the Respondent under the Contempt of Courts Act. The Contempt Petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) ( K.K.TATED, J.) Pg 2 of 2