Shikshan Prasarak Mandal And ANR. v. Mohan Sabaji Naik And ANR.

1/2 wp-1093-02.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1093 OF 2002 Shikshan Prasarak Mandal And Anr.

....Petitioner V/S Mohan Sabaji Naik And Anr.

....Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6263 OF 2008 Mohan Sabaji Naik ....Petitioner V/S The President/ Chairman - Shikshan Prasarak Mandal And Ors.

....Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION IN WP STAMP NO. 4144 OF 2014 In WRIT PETITION 6263 OF 2008 ...

Mohan Sabaji Naik ....Applicant V/S The President/ Chairman, Shikshan Prasarak Mandal And Ors.

....Respondent ...

Mr. Prashant Bhavake, For Petitioner in WP 1093/2002 and R.No.1 in WP 6263/08 and CAW(ST)No.4144/2014.

Mr.Sunil D.Dighe, for Petitioner in WP 6263/08 & for Applicant in CAW (ST) 4144/2014 and for R.No.1 in WP 1093/02.

...

CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J.

DATED : 24 JANUARY 2017 P.C.:

Learned Counsel for the parties state that the matter is settled between the parties. They have tendered consent terms. 2.

The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

Uday.P.Kambli 1/2

2/2 wp-1093-02.doc 3.

The Petitions are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The Civil Application does not survive and to stand disposed of. 4.

Though the consent terms record that the same are binding on all parties, the same would not bind the Respondent-State and its functionaries.

(A.A. SAYED, J.) Uday.P.Kambli 2/2