Vanita Balasaheb Yewale v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/3 nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.811 OF 2017 Vanita BalasahebYevale ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Ms.Pranali P. Kakade, i/b Ms.S.S.Walke, for the Applicant Ms.S. S. Kaushik, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2017 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

By this Application, the Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R.No.26 of 2017 registered with the Uttamnagar Police Station, Pune, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 506(2), 507 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the only allegation qua the Applicant is that she threatened the Complainant. She

2/3 submits that there are absolutely no allegations that the Applicant has cheated anyone.

4.

Learned APP does not dispute the said fact.

5.

Considering the role assigned to the applicant, custodial interrogation of the applicant is not necessary. The application is accordingly allowed and the applicant is granted pre-arrest bail on the following terms and conditions :

ORDER

(i) In the event of the arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount ;

(ii) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station as and when called, till the filing of the charge-sheet or for a period of three months from today, whichever is earlier;

3/3 (iii) The applicant shall not contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case.

6.

The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.

7.

It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie and are confined to this application.

8.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)