Parikshit Indrabal Mukadam And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

by SHARADA RANGNATH WAHULE Date:

2023.06.14 11:53:54 +0530 SHARADA RANGNATH WAHULE 31.aba1259.23.doc Shiv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1259 OF 2023 Parikshit Indrabai Mukadam & Ors.

...Applicants vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Jyotiram S. Yadav for the Applicants.

Mr. H. J. Dedhia APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM :S. M. MODAK, J.

DATED :8TH JUNE 2023 P. C. :

1.

FIR is registered under sections 323, 324, 341, 354, 427, 504, 506 read with 34 of IPC. The maximum sentence is not more than seven years as such the provisions of section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure will come into play. So also the observations of the Apex Court in case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Anr. 1 , will not come in force if such notice is not given. 2.

Let notice under section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure be given to these Applicants on the addresses mentioned in the Application. The Applicants to give their emails and mobile Criminal Appeal No. 1277 of 2014 dated 02/07/2014 (SC) 1/2

31.aba1259.23.doc numbers within a period of seven days from today. 3.

The police are at liberty to serve the Applicants through electronic mode, if physical notice cannot be served for any reason. There remedy to seek further orders is in tact. 4.

Application is disposed of.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] 2/2