Vanita @ Jagruti Jagdish Bhopi And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/3 nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1102 OF 2017 Vanita @Jagruti Jagdish Bhopi and Ors.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.665 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1102 OF 2017 Mirabai Laxman Mhatre and Anr.

...Interveners

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Vanita @Jagruti Jagdish Bhopi and Ors.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr.K.S.Patil i/b Ms.T.S.Avasar, for the Applicants. Mr.S.S.Hulke, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. Mr.Rahul S. Thakur, for the Interveners in APPP/665/2017. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 24th JULY, 2017

2/3 P.C. :

1.

Learned APP states that during the pendency of this application, charge-sheet has been filed as against the applicants in March, 2017. The said statement is accepted.

2.

In view of the statement made by learned APP, the learned counsel for the applicants does not press this application and seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file an application, after filing of the charge-sheet, before the appropriate Court. 3.

Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

4.

It is made clear, that this application has not been heard on merit and if an application for regular bail, after filing of the charge-sheet is filed, the learned Judge shall decide the same as expeditiously as possible and preferably within 2 weeks from the date of filing of the application.

3/3 5.

In view of the aforesaid, the Intervention Application being Criminal Application No.665 of 2017 does not survive and the same is also disposed of.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)