Tatramati Sadanand Pathak v. Chemnad P. Purayil Ummer Farook Shafi And ANR

p6_appw_200_15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.200 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5107 OF 2014 Smt. Taramati S. Pathak ...Applicant

Versus

Chemnad Pudhiya Purayil & Anr.

...Respondents

---- Smt. Taramati Pathak, Applicant in-person present. Smt. A.A. Mane, APP for Respondent No.3-State. CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.

DATED :7th MAY, 2015.

P.C.

Not on board. Taken on board on being mentioned on the ground of urgency.

2.

Heard Smt. Taramati Pathak, Applicant, in-person and learned APP for the State.

3.

Perused the order dated 6-4-2015 in Criminal Writ Petition No.5107 of 2014. No adverse order has been passed against the Applicant. This court has issued certain directions to the Magistrate and has directed the Petitioner to move the Magistrate concerned. As already stated the Applicant cannot have any grievance against the said order.

+ megha Page No.1 of 2

p6_appw_200_15.doc 4.

The Criminal Application No.200 of 2015 is misconceived and is disposed of accordingly.

(JUDGE) megha Page No.2 of 2