Dinesh Ramvilas Gaud v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 913-appp.633.2019 (spk).doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.633 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.448 OF 2019 Dinesh Ramvilas Gaud ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Ms.Yamini S., i/b Ms.T.R.Shetty, for the Applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, A.P.P for the Respondent - State. P.I. - Kandalgaonkar.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 4th JUNE, 2019 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant 2.

By this application, the Applicant seeks extension of time of eight weeks to furnish the surety as directed by this Court vide order dated 6th March, 2019.

This order has been corrected by speaking to minutes order dated 14th June, 2019.

2/2 913-appp.633.2019 (spk).doc 3.

Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the report of one of the sureties has come and that the second surety has not come. She submits that the applicant cannot be attributed for the said delay and therefore seeks extension of time of eight weeks from today to furnish sureties, as directed by this Court vide order dated 6th March, 2019, whilst granting bail to the applicant.

4.

For the reasons set out in the application, application is allowed and time to furnish sureties, as directed by this Court vide order dated 6th March, 2019, is extended by a period of eight weeks from today, to enable the applicant to furnish the sureties. 5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

This order has been corrected by speaking to minutes order dated 14th June, 2019.