Sumit Balasaheb Panchmukh v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 30 IA 1311-2020 in BA ST 2490-2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1311 OF 2020 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 2490 OF 2020 Sumit Balasaheb Panchmukh ... Intervener

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Sumeet Sunil Aaigule ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent .......

Mr. Shailesh Kharat, for the Applicant.

Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for State-Respondent.

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi i/b. Mr. Nitesh Mohite, for Intervener. .....

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 01st FEBRUARY, 2021 P.C. :

.

This Court (CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) vide Order dated 16th December 2020 passed in the main bail application had directed the learned Counsel for the applicant to serve the copy of the application on the learned Counsel for the intervener. Mr. Satyavrat Joshi appears for the intervener and Manjusha

2 / 2 30 IA 1311-2020 in BA ST 2490-2020.odt states that the copy was served on Saturday i.e. 30th January 2021. 2.

In view of the earlier orders passed by this Court, the Intervention Application is allowed to the extent that the intervener is permitted to intervene in the bail application. 3.

The Interim Application is disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)