← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3229/2021allowed

Raptakos, Brett And Co Ltd v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2023-03-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar2 pages

2-WP3229-2021.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3229 OF 2021 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Raptakos, Brett and Co., Ltd.

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2023.03.09 14:51:47 +0530 Mrs. Uma Kshirsagar Wagle, for the Petitioner. Mrs. Madhubala Kajle, 'B' Panel Advocate for the Respondent/ State.

Mr. Ravindra Nair, a/w Mr. C. M. Lokeshappa, for Respondent No.2.

Mrs. Suchita Ankolekar, Sr. Vice President (Personnel) of the Petitioner, present.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

9th MARCH, 2023 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel submit that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and have also executed the Consent Terms. The learned Counsel have tendered the Consent Terms.

3.

Consent Terms are tendered.

4.

Mrs. Suchita Ankolekar, the Senior Vice President of the petitioner and Mr. Krishnan Nair, the authorized representative of respondent No.2 - Sarva Shramik Sangh, are present before the Court. They admit the contents of the Consent Terms and 1/2

2-WP3229-2021.DOC execution thereof. They submit that they have voluntarily executed Consent Terms and there is no coercion or duress. The petitioner and respondent are identified by their respective Counsels.

5.

The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ("X"). 6.

The petition stands allowed in accordance with the Consent Terms ("X").

7.

The undertakings given in the Consent Terms ("X") are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

8.

The impugned Award dated 30th September, 2019 passed by the Industrial Tribunal Maharashtra, Thane, in Reference (IT) No.2 of 2010 stands set aside. 9.

The petition stands disposed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2