Mrs. Vatsalabai Tukaram Kavade v. Shri Jayawant Sarjerao Kavade And Others

8.cac 228.13.doc ingale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 228 OF 2013 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO. 14292 OF 2013 Mr.Vatsalabai Tukaram Kavade Through POA Tukaram Vishnoo Kavade ...

Applicant Vs.

Shri Jayawant Sarjerao Kavade and others ...

Respondents Mr.Tukaram V.Kavade, Applicant in-person present. Mr.Swapnil R.Patil i/b Mr.S.V.Sadavarte, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 4.

Ms.Pooja Badekar i/b Mr.Madhav Jamdar, Advocate for Respondents No.9 to 12.

CORAM :

R. G. KETKAR, J.

DATE : 12th JUNE, 2015 P.C. :

.

Heard Mr.Tukaram V.Kavade, applicant in-person, Mr.Swapnil R.Patil, learned Counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 and Ms.Pooja Badekar, learned Counsel for respondents No. 9 to 12. 2.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 28 days in filing the Civil Revision Application. Office remark shows that respondents No. 1 to 16D are served. The petitioner- Mr.Kavade assures that during the course of the day, he will give copy of this application to Ms.Badekar.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application as also having 1/2

8.cac 228.13.doc regard to the fact that delay is of 28 days, I am satisfied that a sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. That apart, the application is not controverted. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs. Office shall register the Civil Revision Application, if it is otherwise ready. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) 2/2