Sindhu R Bagade v. The State Of Maharashtra

2023:BHC-AS:29515

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 946 OF 2023 SINDHU REWARAM BAGDE ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ALONG WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 947 OF 2023 SINDHU REWARAM BAGDE @ SAU NILIMA JITENDRA DESAI ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ALONG WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 953 OF 2023 SINDHU REWARAM BAGDE @ SAU NILIMA DESAI ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ALONG WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 954 OF 2023 SINDHU REWARAM BAGDE @ SAU NILIMA JITENDRA DESAI ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ALONG WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1142 OF 2023 SINDHU REWARAM BAGDE @ SAU NILIMA JITENDRA DESAI ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT 1/3

ALONG WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1292 OF 2023 SINDHU R BAGADE ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ALONG WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1295 OF 2023 SINDHU R BAGADE ..APPLICANT VS.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ---------- Adv. Afsar Ansari i/b Auris Legal, for the applicant. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.

---------- CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 20, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

A praecipe has been moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 06.10.2023. Due to typographical error in the order dated 06.10.2023 in paragraph 2 in box first row in column No.4 the words Pali, Pune be read as "Pali, Raigad". In operative part of the said order in paragraph 8(b)(i) the words Pali, Pune be read as "Pali, Raigad".

3.

Order stands corrected accordingly.

2/3

4.

This order be treated as part of the order dated 06.10.2023. (M. S. KARNIK, J.) 3/3