Pratik Babasaheb Thakur v. The State Of Maharashtra

ssm 1 902-ba931.18.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 931 OF 2018 Yug S/o. Ravindrapal Singh Tuli ....Applicant.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra ....Respondent.

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 435 OF 2018 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 931 OF 2018 Rakesh Lakdawala ....Applicant.

(Intervenor) Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

....Respondents.

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 550 OF 2018 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 931 OF 2018 Mr. Pratik Babasaheb Thakur ....Applicant.

(Intervenor) Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

....Respondents.

Mr. Shirish Gupte, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shyasm Dewani with Mr. Chirag Chanani with Ms. Supriya Kak with Mr. Pratik Thakkar i/by Dewani Associates for the Applicant in Bail Application NO. 931 of 2018.

Mr. Satish Maneshinde and Ms. Lakshmi Raman for the Applicant/Intervenor in Application No. 435 of 2018. Mr. Subhash Jha a/w Ms. Sanjana Pardeshi i/by Mr. Prakash Wagh for the Applicant/Intervenor in Application No. 550 of 2018. Mr. Prakash Shetty, Special P.P. for the Respondent-State. 1/2

ssm 2 902-ba931.18.sxw CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 27th APRIL, 2018.

P.C.:- Heard Mr. Gupte, the learned Senior Counsel for the Applicant in Bail Application No. 931 of 2018, at length, Mr. Shetty, the learned Special P.P. for the Respondent-State, Mr. Maneshinde and Mr. Subhash Jha, the learned counsel for the interveners. Perused the entire record produced before this Court. For the reasons recorded separately, Bail Application No. 931 of 2018, is rejected.

In view of the order passed in the Bail Application No. 931 of 2018, the Application Nos. 435 of 2018 and 550 of 2018 for intervention are accordingly disposed off.

(A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2