Arun Harishchandra Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 /2 22-aba-835-1.doc Ladda FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 835 of 2016. Arun Harischandra Jadhav Vs. The State of Maharashtra Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr H.S. Deshpande, for the applicant.

Smt. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the State.

API S.S.Jadhav, Tulinj P.S. Nalasopara present. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J.

DATE : 19th September, 2016 P.C.

1) The learned APP, on instructions from the Investigating Officer who is present in Court, submitted that in pursuance of the Order dated 6/5/2016, the applicant has attended the Investigating Officer and joined the process of investigation. She further, on instructions, submitted that the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not necessary for further investigation. However, the applicant may be directed to attend the Investigating Officer till completion of investigation and filing of the charge-sheet. 2) In view of the above, the interim relief granted by an order dated 6/5/2016 is hereby confirmed with modification in clause No. 5 (d) of the said order that the applicant shall attend the Investigating Officer as and when called for between 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. till

2 /2 22-aba-835-1.doc filing of the charge-sheet for the purpose of investigation. It is needless to mention that before calling the applicant to the police station, the investigating officer or any other concerned police officer from the concerned police station shall issue a notice under section 160 of Code of Criminal Procedure to the applicant. 3) The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)