← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/5/2020

Arun Krushnarao Patil v. Vasantdada Sahakari Pani Puravatha Sanstha Through Its Chairman / Secretary Maryadit

2020-02-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte2 pages

Chittewan 1/2

34. CAWst 12577-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9127 OF 2012 Arun Krushnarao Patil ...

Applicant In the matter between :

Vasantdada Sahakari Pani Puravatha Sanstha ...

Petitioner

Versus

Arun Krushnarao Patil ...

Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9057 OF 2012 Balasaheb Shankar Jadhav ...

Applicant In the matter between :

Vasantdada Sahakari Pani Puravatha Sanstha ...

Petitioner

Versus

Balasaheb Shankar Jadhav ...

Respondent .....

Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam for the Applicants/Org. Respondents. Mr. Manoj A. Patil for the Respondent/Org. Petitioner. .....

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

DATE : 11 FEBRUARY 2020

Chittewan 2/2

34. CAWst 12577-19.doc P.C. :

.

These Civil Applications seek permission to withdraw amount deposited by the Petitioner towards the difference of wages in case of each of the three Applicants (original respondents). Learned Counsel for the Respondent (original petitioner) opposes the application. In the facts of the case, this court is of the view that it would be in the interest of justice to allow the applications. Both civil applications are allowed by permitting the respective Applicants to withdraw the amounts deposited by the Petitioner pursuant to the order dated 25 February 2013 in the pending writ petitions, subject to the Applicants submitting an undertaking in usual form acceptable to the Registry to bring back the amount, in case the petitions are decided against them. It is ordered accordingly. The civil applications are disposed of.

(S.C. GUPTE, J.) by Rajesh V.

Chittewan Date: 2020.02.17 15:58:08 +0530 Rajesh V.

Chittewan