Ajay Harbhajan Singh v. State Of Maharashtra

40 WP-1739-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1739 OF 2022 Ajay Harbhajan Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

--------- Mr. Arsh Misra, for Petitioner.

Mr. M.H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent-State.

--------- CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

DATED : 3rd April, 2023 P.C. :

.

Heard.

2.

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

3.

The grievances of the Petitioner is, as follows: i) He is not being produced regularly before the trial Court, which is Sessions Court, Thane.

ii) The Petitioner has not been supplied with the copy of charge-sheet.

4.

Both the grievances can be redressed appropriately by the trial Court at Thane. We, therefore, direct the concerned trial Court at Thane to look into the grievances of the Petitioner and take appropriate decision in the matter.

5.

Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No costs. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) Husen Page 1 of 1