Sulekh Anees Don v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS.
(18)PIL18316.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.183 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.137 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.49 OF 2019 Sulekh Anees Don ..Petitioner/Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.114 OF 2017 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.183 OF 2016 Maharashtra Rajya Mukhyadhikari Sanghatana ..Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Sulekh Anees Don ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Ms. Ujjwala Agrawal a/w Ms. Jyoti S. Agrawal I/by Mr. Chetan Agrawal, Advocates for the Petitioner & Applicant in CAI No.137/2016 & CAI No.49/2019.
Mr. K. S. Thorat, AGP for Respondent No.1.
Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Vinod Mahadik, Advocate for MCGM.
Mr. N. R. Bubna a/w Mr. F. A. Wasif, Advocates for Applicant in CAI No.114/2017.
Mr. A. S. Rao, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Ms. Nazia S. A. Shaikh I/by Mr. P. J. Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
BGP. 1 of 2
(18)PIL18316.doc.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & NITIN JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 7th AUGUST, 2019 P.C.
1] The Petition is loosely drafted. The exact grievance is not emerging. Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Public Interest Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition but after making proper pleadings. Granting liberty as prayed for, the Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Office to return the deposit made as per rules. 2] Needless to state all pending Civil Applications are disposed of as infructuous.
NITIN JAMDAR, J CHIEF JUSTICE BGP. 2 of 2