Kafil Vakil Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

ABA 915-18.doc Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 915 OF 2018 Kafil Vakil Shaikh .Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. N. Pandey a/w Ms P. Shukla i/b. Mr. A. K. Upadhyay, Advocate, for the Applicant Ms Pallavi Dabholkar, APP, for the Respondent - State

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

03.05.2018 P.C.

.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw this Application. He states that the Applicant will surrender within a week, before the appropriate Court after giving notice of the date and time of surrender. 2.

Accordingly, the Application is dismissed as withdrawn. If an Application for regular bail is preferred by the Applicant, the learned Judge shall decide the same on its own merits uninfluenced by the withdrawal of this Application.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)