Aniruddha Balkrishna Joshi And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

31.WP-2833-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2833 OF 2021 Aniruddha Balkrishna Joshi and another .... Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra and another .... Respondents ....

Mr. Kishor Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP, for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Shakib Dhorajiwala, Advocate a/w. Saurabh Nikalje i/b. Vidhi Partners, for Respondent No.2.

....

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 26 OCTOBER 2021 P.C.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Having perused the FIR, when it was indicated to the learned counsel for the Petitioners that this case cannot be considered as a rarest of rare case for invocation of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the learned counsel submitted that after the charge-sheet is filed the Petitioners will apply for discharge and that their contentions be kept open. by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date:

2021.10.28 14:38:51 +0530 3.

In view of this statement, the Writ Petition is disposed of. PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Deshmane (PS) 1 / 1