Union Of India v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

APPLN.306/2016(61) mnm

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 306 OF 2016 Union of India ...Applicant Vs.

1. State of Maharashtra

2. Shri Atonu Kumar Ghosal

...Respondents

Mr. Rajnath Pathak, Advocate for the Applicant Ms. S.S. Pathak, APP for the State Mr. Sachwani, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM : M.S. KARNIK, J.

DATED :13TH DECEMBER, 2016 P.C. :

Learned Counsel for the parties submit that with a passage of time the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge has already worked out. In this view of the matter the learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 states that he may be granted liberty to make fresh application for appropriate reliefs before the learned Sessions Judge. If such an application is made, the same shall be considered on its own merits. The present application is accordingly disposed of.

(M.S. KARNIK, J.)