Uday Sitaram Gosavi v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And ORS
1/5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2021.12.10 18:29:08 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 1829 OF 2021 Maruti Rangrao Kamble ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6235 OF 2021 Anil Shrimanta Aiwale ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6222 OF 2021 Rajat Ramesh Nevage ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6224 OF 2021 Uday Sitaram Gosavi ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6223 OF 2021 Dipak Pandurang Kamble ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..... Respondents Mr.Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioners in above writ petitions. Mr.V.M.Mali, A.G.P., Mrs.P.J.Gavhane, A.G.P., Ms.S.S.Bhende,
2/5 A.G.P., Mr.N.K.Rajpurohit, A.G.P. for the Respondent State in above writ petitions.
CORAM: R. D. DHANUKA AND R.N.LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 9th DECEMBER, 2021 P.C:- Mr. Bhavake, learned counsel for the petitioners on instruction seeks liberty to delete the respondent nos. 6 and 7 from the cause title of the above writ petitions. Liberty is granted as prayed. Leave to amend is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Reverification is dispensed with. 2.
Rule. Learned A.G.P. waives service for the respondents in above writ petitions. By consent of parties, above writ petitions are heard finally.
3.
By these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek an order and direction against the respondent no.5 to decide the proposal submitted by the Educational Institution and the Head Master, for individual approval to the appointment of the petitioners in the post of peon at school and for other reliefs.
3/5 4.
It is the case of the petitioners that the proposal filed by the management for individual approval of the petitioners which are still pending and are as under :- Writ petition number Date of Proposal Writ Petition No. 1829 of 2021 03.08.2019 Writ Petition No. 6235 of 2021 18.12.2019 Writ Petition No. 6222 of 2021 28.12.2018 Writ Petition No. 6223 of 2021 28.12.2018 Writ Petition No. 6224 of 2021 07.06.2011 Statements made by the petitioners in the above writ petitions are accepted.
5.
The respondent no.5 is accordingly directed to decide the said proposal submitted by the management and the school for individual approval for the appointment of the petitioners on the post of peon at the respondent no.7 school within eight weeks from today. 6.
Mr.Bhavake, learned counsel for the petitioners agree to furnish a photocopy of the proposal with acknowledgment of the Education Officer to the office of the Education Officer within one week from today. If the Education Officer is not able to trace the said proposal, a copy that would be submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners
4/5 shall be treated as the proposal for the said appointment and shall be disposed of within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the acknowledged copy of the said proposal. The order that would be passed shall be communicated to the petitioners within one week from the date of passing of such order.
7.
If any adverse order is passed against the petitioners, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings. 8.
This Court has not expressed any views on the merits of the matters.
9.
All contentions of both the parties are kept open. 10.
All the above writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. 11.
It is made clear that if the proposal is granted as claimed by the management, the Education Officer shall enter the name of the petitioner in the Shalarth ID within two weeks from the date of granting such approval and shall release the grant-in-aid for the said
5/5 appointment from the date of initial appointment within four weeks thereafter.
12.
The parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. [R.N.LADDHA, J.] [R.D.DHANUKA, J.]