← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/2753/2014

Mrs. Asha Popat Sakat And ORS. v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And Another

2018-07-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane2 pages

5.CAF.2753.14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2753 OF 2014 WITH FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 14778 OF 2014 Asha Popat Sakat & Ors.

... Applicants/Appellants V/s.

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

... Respondents Mr. Vasant Kadam i/b Mr. Y.P. Narvankar for the Applicants/Appellants. Mr. S.M. Dange for Respondent No.1.

CORAM :

K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE :

25th JULY, 2018.

P.C. :

Heard learned Counsel for the Applicants/Appellants and the learned Counsel for the Respondent-Assurance Company. Despite service of notice, no one else appeared on behalf of Respondent No.2 owner of the offending vehicle. The present Application is filed to condone the delay of 309 days in filing the First Appeal against the impugned judgment and award passed by the M.A.C.T. Karad, District Satara in M.A.C.P. No.219 of 2009. Learned Counsel for the Applicants/Appellants submits that the delay caused for filing the First Appeal is not intentional and deliberate but caused due to unavoidable circumstances. The Applicants/Appellants are widow and the children of the deceased Popat Sakat, who died in vehicular Waghmare 1/2

5.CAF.2753.14.doc accident. He quested to condone the delay. Learned Counsel for the Respondent-Assurance Company fairly submits to pass suitable order in the interest of justice. As referred above, Respondent No.2 owner of the offending vehicle remained absent. In such circumstances, no opportunity received for hearing on his behalf into the matter. Taking into consideration the nature of the subject matter and the reasons mentioned in the Application, there is no impediment to condone the delay to present an appeal against the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal. Definitely it would sub-serve the purpose for substantial justice into the matter. Hence, Application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, the Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

Delay cause for presenting an Appeal against impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal in M.A.C.P. No.219 of 2009 is hereby condoned. Registry to take requisite steps for further process. On registration of Appeal, issue notice of admission to Respondents. Learned Counsel Mr. S.M. Dange waives service of notice for Respondent No.1. Issue notice to Respondent No.2 returnable on 21.08.2018. (K.K. SONAWANE, J.)

2018.07.27 17:55:49 +0530 Waishali Sushil Waghmare Waghmare 2/2