Bharat Gandhi @ Raju Ramniklal Gandhi v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

8-110. APL 72.22.doc JPP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2022 with INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2215 OF 2022 in CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2022 with INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2217 OF 2022 in CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2022 with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2022 with INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2216 OF 2022 in CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2022 Bharat Gandhi @ Raju Ramniklal Gandhi ... Applicant V/s.

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

... Respondents Ms. Sindhu Kotian a/w. Akash Gaonkar a/w Mohan Kanojia a/w. Akshay Sawant a/w. Yash Pitroda i/b. I.V. Merchant and Co. for the Applicants Mr. Raju K. i/b. Lex Juris for Respondent No.2 in IA 2215/22 Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent - State in APL 72/22 Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent - State in APL 75/22 CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE : 10 AUGUST 2022

8-110. APL 72.22.doc P.C. :- The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that it is correct that the charge has been framed and the summons have been issued. The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that instructions have been received to withdraw the Applications to adopt such remedies as are available in law. The Applications are accordingly disposed of. Interim Applications do not survive and are disposed of.

N.R. BORKAR, J.

NITIN JAMDAR, J.

JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR by JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR Date: 2022.08.12 10:29:46 +0530