S.D. Kulal v. S.P. Kulal And Others

216-sa410-94 vai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.410 OF 1994 Sushila D. Kulal ...Appellant V/s.

Suman P. Kulal & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr.P.R. Suryawanshi i/b Mr.G.M. Savagave for the Appellant. Mr.S.S. Kulkarni for the Respondent Nos.1-A to 1-F. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.

DATE : 13TH OCTOBER, 2016.

P.C. :- 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that both the parties to this second appeal have already entered into an agreement with the developer and have been rehabilitated by the developer. A copy of the documents entered into between the parties with the developer along with the affidavit is tendered by the learned counsel for the appellant. He submits that in view of this development, this second appeal has become infructuous. The documents tendered by the learned counsel for the appellant are taken on record. The statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant is accepted.

2.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for 1/2

216-sa410-94 the appellant, the second appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.) 2/2