Bombay High CourtABA/911/2017others disposed off
Bharat Murlidhar Kashid v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
2017-09-14Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Mridula Bhatkar1 pages
Trupti 901-aba-911-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 911 OF 2017 Bharat Murlidhar Kashid ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
......
Mr.Harshal S.Patil i/b. Mr.Aashish Satpute for the Applicant. Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa, APP for the Respondent-State.
......
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATED:
SEPTEMBER 14, 2017 P.C. :
1.
Learned counsel for the applicant-accused, on instructions, submits that the Anticipatory Bail Application does not survive because the applicant-accused is already arrested.
2.
In view of the above submission, Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed accordingly.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)