Sangeeta D/O. Suklal Bhamre Dipika W/O. Sanjay Chavan v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee And ORS.

sng wp-6126.17 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6126 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders.

Registrar's orders.

Shri Mahesh Deshmukh i/b Shri Prabhanjan Gujar for the Petitioner. Shri A.A. Alaspurkar, AGP for the Respondent No.1. Shri G.S. Godbole i/b Shri Dhrupad S.Patil and Ms. Shruti Tulpule for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

- CORAM :

A.S. OKA & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ DATED :

19TH JULY 2017 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, the learned AGP for the first Respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the second and third Respondents.

2.

By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the challenge is to the order passed by the first Respondent Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee dated 16th May 2017.

sng wp-6126.17 The said order has been passed on an Application made by the present Petitioner on the same date. The Application proceeds on the footing that an affidavit-in-lieu of the examination-in-chief has been filed on behalf of the second and third Respondents. The said application has been rejected by the impugned order.

3.

The learned counsel appearing for the second and third Respondents on instructions states that the said Respondents have not filed any such affidavitin-lieu of the examination-in-chief and that they do not propose to file any such affidavit. He pointed out that in fact, the second Respondent has filed written submissions, a copy of which has been filed and annexed at Exhibit-A to the Petition.

4.

We accept the statement of the second and third Respondents. In view of this statement, it is not necessary to entertain this Petition. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of.

(SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI, J) (A.S.OKA, J)