Ashutosh Anil Crystonia v. The State Of Maharashtra

MINAL SANDIP PARAB by MINAL SANDIP PARAB Date:

2022.06.11 16:18:18 +0530 67_WP2075_17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2075 OF 2017 Ashutosh Anil Crystonia ...

Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent Through post. None for petitioner.

Ms. M. H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent-State.

CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 10, 2022 P.C. :

.

The petitioner's contention is that he has been falsely implicated in the offence alleged against him and therefore, this Court should look into the matter and acquit him or release him on bail. No detailed particulars have been furnished by the petitioner.

2.

It is not possible to consider the prayer of the petitioner under extraordinary jurisdiction. The petitioner may avail an appropriate remedy as available in law if he so advised.

3.

With the above observations, writ petition stands disposed of. 4.

Registry shall send a copy of this order to the concerned jail authority, who in turn, shall communicate the same to the petitioner. (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.) Minal Parab 1/1