Murgun @ Gurudatta Vairavat Vaishnav v. The State Of Maharashtra

37-APPA-665-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.665 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1065 OF 2015 MURGUN@GURUDATTA VAIRAVAT VAISHNAV )...APPLICANT V/s.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT Mr.Arjun Kode and Mr.Saugand Zende, Advocates for the Applicant. Mr.P.H.Gaikwad-Patil, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

P. N. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

19th SEPTEMBER 2016.

P.C. :

Heard learned counsel for applicant. This is an application for time to furnish surety and to continue applicant on cash bail of Rs.15,000/- for further period of six weeks.

Learned counsel for applicant has submitted that this court while suspending substantive sentence imposed upon applicant has released him on bail as granted by learned trial court with fresh bond. Learned counsel for applicant makes a statement that applicant was avk 1/2

37-APPA-665-2016.doc released on cash bail of Rs.15,000/- with direction to furnish surety and he has accordingly furnished surety, but after verification, surety produced was disqualified. Applicant, therefore, prayed that he be continued on cash bail till above process of acceptance of surety produced by him afresh is complete.

Considering the fact that, applicant, on disqualification of first surety, has produced another surety, of whose verification is in process, application is liable to be allowed by continuing applicant on cash bail for a period of six weeks, within which time, process of acceptance of surety may be completed.

(P. N. DESHMUKH, J.) avk 2/2