Deepali Chandan Samant v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
Dond 1/2 apl.596-2016.sxw FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 596 OF 2016 Smt. Deepali Chandan Samant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.G. Abbas Kazmi for applicant.
Mr. Abdul Millwala for Respondent Nos.2 to 5. Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP for State.
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J.
DATE : 28th June 2016.
P.C.:
1.
This is an application for quashing of the cases/complaints instituted by the applicant-wife. The list of the said cases as mentioned in the prayer clause of this Application for brevity is reproduced as under: (i) 498-A Case (2335/PW/2010) (ii) Domestic Violence Case in Sessions Court (Cri. Appeal No.274 of 2013) and (22nd , Andheri M.M. Court C.C. No.15/DV/2010). (iii) Abuse & Assault Case in Andheri Court (829/PW/2014) & (1110/PW/2012).
(iv) SC/ST Cases in Sessions Court & Andheri Court (SC 16 of 2012 & (22nd Andheri Case: 602/PW/2012).
Dond 1/2 apl.596-2016.sxw 2.
The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the parties herein have settled their dispute inter-se which was pending before the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai and they have filed the consent terms dated 22.2.2016. He further submitted that in pursuance of Clause-6 of the consent terms, the applicant wants to withdraw the said complaints as she is not desirous to persue the said complaints hereinafter.
3.
I have perused the consent terms which are at Exhibit-A to the application. In view of the consent terms filed by the parties and in the interest of justice the aforesaid cases in forgoing paragraph are hereby quashed. 4.
Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)