← Library
Bombay High CourtCRA/729/2014

Shri Makbool C Khan v. Shri M.S. Chhotu

2016-06-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar2 pages

1 / 2 CRA /729/2014 Tapadia RR/B.902

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 729 OF 2014 Shri Makbool C. Khan, since deceased,through Legal Heirs:

1(a) Smt Salmabi w/o Makbook C. Khan and Ors.

..Applicants Vs Shri M.S.Chhotu, since deceased, through his legal heirs:

1-A) Aminabi Khan and Ors.

.. Respondents Ms. Seema Sarnaik, Advocate for Applicants.

CORAM : R.G.KETKAR,J.

DATE : 14/06/2016 PC:

1.

Heard Ms Seema Sarnaik, learned counsel for the applicants.

2.

By this application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.'), the applicants, hereinafter referred to as 'plaintiffs', have challenged the Judgment and decree dated 31.8.2007 passed by the learned Judge, presiding over Court Room No.6 of the Small Causes Court at Bombay in L.E. & C. Suit No.54/54 of 1997 as also the Judgment and order dated 19.3.2014 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai (Bandra) in Appeal No.223 of 2008. the courts below dismissed the suit instituted by the applicants for

2 / 2 CRA /729/2014 recovery of possession of Room admeasuring 10'x14' in Salmabi Chawl, Q-Block, Squatters Colony, Bandra Plot, Jogeshwari (East) Mumbai (for short, 'suit premises') on the ground that the defendant is a licensee not protected by the provisions of law. The Courts below held that the defendant is a protected tenant. 3.

Ms. Sarnaik states that Applicant no.1(b)-Zafrulla Maqbool Khan is present in the Court. She has tendered photocopy of PAN Card which is taken on record and marked 'x' for identification. Upon taking instructions from him, she seeks permission to withdraw this Application with liberty to institute fresh proceedings on the same cause of action.

4.

On the motion made by Ms. Sarnaik, Application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All contentions of the parties on merits are expressly kept open.

(R.G.KETKAR, J.)