Surendra Shashikant Karnik v. The State Of Maharashtra

ABA 949-17.doc Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.949 OF 2017 Surendra Shashikant Karnik .Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.Sudhir Halli, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.R.Ambekar, APP, for the Respondent - State Mr.Satyavrat Joshi, Advocate, for the Intervenor Mrs.Sharmishtha Ghorage-Walavalkar, ACP (Crime Branch), Solapur present

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

29.06.2017 P.C.

.

Learned APP on instructions of the investigating officer, who is present in the Court today, states that the charge-sheet in the said case has been filed.

2.

In view of the statement made by the learned APP, on instructions, the learned counsel for the Applicant does not press this Application and seeks leave to withdraw the same

ABA 949-17.doc with liberty to file a fresh Application, after filing of the charge-sheet, before the appropriate Court.

3.

Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

4.

It is made clear, that if an Application is filed, after filing of the charge-sheet, the same shall be decided by the learned Judge, on its own merits, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of this Application.

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)